Read e-book Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology book. Happy reading Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF Homophobe: A Logical Response to an Ignorant Ideology Pocket Guide.

Join Kobo & start eReading today

Michael D. Inside the Animal Mind. George Page. The Cichlid Fishes. George Barlow.

Snakes, Sunrises, and Shakespeare. Gordon H. Alan Rauch. Resurrection Science.

Why Is Everyone Getting So Offended?

Freaks of Nature : And what they tell us about evolution and development. Mark S. Mary Batten. The Biophilia Hypothesis. Stephen R. Evolution's Rainbow. Joan Roughgarden. Carin Bondar. Becky Crew. Luke Hunter. Animal Minds. Donald R. Research Methodology in Landscape Architecture.

Nik Ismail Azlan. Tracks and Shadows. Harry W. Flight Ways. Thom van Dooren. The Emperor's Embrace. Jeffrey Masson. Powerful Peace. Robert DuBois. Made in Detroit. Paul Clemens. Man the Hunted. Donna Hart. Do Animals Think?

Clive D. Gray's Anatomy E-Book. Susan Standring. Francisco Bethencourt. Bridget Stutchbury Two-Book Bundle. Bridget Stutchbury. Mousy Cats and Sheepish Coyotes. John Shivik. Driven Out. Jean Pfaelzer. The Real Chimpanzee. Christophe Boesch. The Boreal Owl. Statistics Explained. Steve McKillup. Not So Different. Nathan H. Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates. Kathreen Ruckstuhl. Jo Joe. Sally Wiener Grotta. The Animals' Agenda. Jessica Pierce. Nevertheless, if there is a genetic predisposition we are not admitting there is , then the following questions are relevant and that is why the first one is asked.

If homosexuality is genetically based, then this has implications for other sexual behaviors based upon people simply being born that way. And, he's correct in affirming the problem with psychopaths based on the logic presented by the homosexual community stating that sexual orientation is a genetic predisposition. It is a dismissal without proper response. Answer: "Genetics has nothing to do with it. Answer: "Thing is, people under age dont have the brains to practice safe sex, can be taken advantage off etc.

Answer: "This has nothing to do with homosexuality in fact. The issue is about people who are born with certain sexual predispositions. Ignoring the question is not sufficient. CONSENT : If what is sexually permissible is what is based on consent, then what do you do with adolescents who consent to having sex with much older people?

Homophobia and the Modern Trans Movement - Quillette

Is it okay? But must be older than 18 so he knows what hes doing. It is about adolescents the implication being younger than year-old. The question has now been modified to include "younger-than Answer: "Generally no, though of course some moral views held by the majority of a society does need to be enforced to keep that society from falling apart.

Views on murder should probably be enforced, even at the state level, but homosexuality doesn't seem to me to fall into the same level. Answer: "The term moral right makes no sense, as for practical purposes all rights are accepted or granted on a legal basis by states or groups. Moral rights refers to the concept of inalienable rights, but such have never been shown to exist in practice, even if famous people have believed such exist, and even if such are claimed to exist in important documents.

This is a bit tautologous but sufficient. The answer does not distinguish between moral and legal rights. The issue is morality, not legality. Values of a culture do change with time and provided freedom of expression and thought, every group would have a right to try and influence that change, however no group would have a right to actually impose values on others, nor could they if they wanted to. Imposing restrictions or granting permissions however is something that can be done and in our country is done by our elected representatives in adherence with a document recognizing and protecting multiple rights of citizens.

But, the homosexual community is imposing their values on the rest of society by trying to get laws passed in favor of protecting homosexual behavior. Anyone who would argue to the contrary is uninformed. So, the homosexual community is imposing its moral values on the rest of society by trying to get laws passed in its favor. Answer: "It might be arrogant, but arrogance doesn't make something wrong. To use an example: Several Christian groups have historically tried and some still do try to change society to meet their moral preferences.

They're not wrong to do so, so long as they don't infringe on someone else's rights. However, Christians are not seeking to redefine morality but to protect it. The terms do not exist in the recognized scientific literature Breiner, an advocate of Reparative therapy , claims "There is no doubt that homophobia exists" as an irrational fear among both homosexuals and heterosexuals.

Navigation menu

In response, many Christians look to Bible verses such as, 2 Timothy "For God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind. Erik Holland, author of "The Nature of Homosexuality," perceives that homosexuals have become so reckless in labeling others homophobic that "anyone who questions their labeling someone a homophobe is called a homophobe himself. Even quoting factual statistics about the connection between homosexuality and AIDS is allegedly homophobic.

The term "homophobia" is sometimes associated with a theory that anybody who is hetero-normative, or disapproves of homosexual behaviors of any kind, or finds homosexuality distasteful, is secretly homosexual. This "repressed gay" theory has no scientific basis whatsoever. It is merely a means of psychological intimidation and mind control used in promoting the homosexual agenda. By this means a powerful stigma is attached to those who even conscientiously oppose homosexual practices, thus silencing many who might otherwise object to it.

In relation to such oppression, psychologist Nicholas Cummings, former president of the American Psychological Association APA , observed, "Homophobia as intimidation is one of the most pervasive techniques used to silence anyone who would disagree with the gay activist agenda.

Cummings said. While not all homosexuals agree with such tactics, it has been explicitly promoted by leaders in the LGBT movement. In what is widely regarded as the handbook for the homosexual agenda, Harvard trained marketing experts and social scientists Marshall Kirk - and Hunter Madsen advocated avoiding portraying homosexuals as aggressive challengers, but as "victims", while making those who opposed them as "evil persecutors". As a means of the latter, they promoted "jamming," in which Christians, traditionalists, or anyone else who opposes the homosexual agenda are publicly smeared.

The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable," they suggested.

Thus, "propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths Marshall Kirk died in at the age of The cause of death has not been publicly revealed but is suspected to have been HIV-related. Author Robert Bauman additionally records, "It makes no difference that the ads are lies. There are increasing indications that pro-homosexual attempts at brainwashing have been highly effective, as assent to such an irrational perception by homosexuals, or assent to its deceptive tactics, is not confined to those within actual homosexual organizations, as mainstream media and academic publications often arbitrarily use the term to describe all those who oppose homosexuality, and its attendant practices.

Recently, the government of Brazil relegated all who oppose homosexuality to being "homophobic". Muller described how the homosexual lobby has gained widespread acceptance in the educational realm. With a rapidity largely attributable in large part to a total lack of articulate resistance, homosexual ideology has gained an unquestioned and uncontested legitimacy in American academic life. Within the academy, as within nonacademic elite culture, the definition of opposite to homosexuality as "homophobia - a definition which implies that it is impossible to give good reasons for the cultural disapproval of homosexuality - is the best evidence of the success of this strategy.

The American College of Pediatricians, commenting on one prototypical pro-homosexual bias which indicts contrary views as "homophobic", stated that such a response is "scientifically improper and demonstrates an anti-heterosexual viewpoint. This has also resulted in extreme attempts to negate the Biblical injunctions against homoeroticism and to read it into the Bible, in seeking affirmation for the sin. See Homosexual misinterpretation.

It may be speculated that the widespread response to labeling all who oppose homosexuals "homophobic" may itself be driven by an irrational fear of those who oppose them, in which homosexuals imagine that most or all of those who oppose them are motivated by irrational fears, and wish to do them harm, and from which type of people they must be especially protected.

It has also been claimed by preeminent pro-homosexual psychotherapist, John J. McNeill, that "Interiorized self-hatred is the sin of gay people, and we must learn to see it that way. In , lawmakers amended the Hate Crime Statistics Act to include bias against persons with disabilities. In , law enforcement agencies reported 1, hate crime offenses based on sexual-orientation bias, of which are property crimes which includes theft and graffiti. Thus a conclusion that all offenders are heterosexual is faulty, and the methodology does not measure violence within the homosexual community.

In all of , there was one anti-homosexual murder in the United States, and the FBI has reported none since. While bias-motivated crimes of persons against homosexuals were reported nationwide in , an earlier study found incidences of homosexual domestic violence in only nine cities, all of which are crimes of persons. The subject of homosexual domestic violence has not been researched with anything near the thoroughness afforded to heterosexual domestic violence.

In effect, "homophobia" is a bogus term invented to suppress and eradicate all resistance to the normalization of homosexual behavior under any circumstances, or criticism of LGBT ideology, activism and the LGBT agenda. It is being applied to an ever-wider range of things, such as resistance to increased political and social power of homosexuals in advancing their agenda.